
Audience research
Part of Buying review software or building audience research in-house?
Why commerce reviews competitor research starts with your own data
Commerce reviews competitor research works best as a checklist: cover the DMCC Act, ASA endorsement rules, ICO email consent and the questions worth asking.
What to take away
- Legislation.gov.UK records the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 as receiving Royal Assent on 24 May 2024, and it widened the consumer protection regime the CMA enforces.
- Benchmark, for example, five to eight rivals on review volume, recency and rating spread rather than star average alone.
- Treat competitor review request emails as evidence of cadence, never as a template for consent wording.
- Keep your own review data as the baseline, because rivals only show what the market already rewards.
What should a competitor review audit cover first?
Start with your own data. Export twelve months of ratings, reply times and recurring complaints from your product pages and marketplaces. That export is the baseline every rival gets measured against.
Five things to log per rival
- Average rating
- Review count
- Date of newest review
- Share marked verified
- Reply rate
Your reviews vs rivals
Your reviews only
- Average rating
- 4.6
- Reviews in last 90 days
- 12
- Newest review
- 6 days ago
- Verified share
- 70%
- Owner replies
- 0%
Your set plus rivals
- Average rating
- 4.1 to 4.7
- Reviews in last 90 days
- 3 to 90
- Newest review
- 6 days to 11 months
- Verified share
- 20% to 85%
- Owner replies
- 0% to 60%
If your own set is thin, the commerce reviews audience research guide for England explains how to segment reviewers by need before you widen the comparison.
Pick a competitor set you can actually read. Choose businesses selling at a similar price point to a similar buyer. Mixed sets produce averages that mean nothing.
Public review pages are the cheapest evidence you have. Marketplaces and independent review sites all show dates, so you can see whether a competitor's momentum is recent or stale.
Then record five things for each: average rating, review count, date of newest review, share marked verified, and reply rate.
The before and after table below shows the shape of the change, using illustrative figures rather than measured data.
Competitor review audit
Your reviews only
- Average rating
- 4.6
- Reviews in last 90 days
- 12
- Newest review
- 6 days ago
- Verified share
- 70%
- Owner replies
- 0%
Your set plus rivals
- Average rating
- 4.1 to 4.7
- Reviews in last 90 days
- 3 to 90
- Newest review
- 6 days to 11 months
- Verified share
- 20% to 85%
- Owner replies
- 0% to 60%
Add a notes column for recurring themes: delivery, sizing, returns and support.
Which claims rules apply to review copy you borrow?
Rivals quote reviews in ads, emails and landing pages. The ASA topic page on claims, endorsements and testimonials sets out how testimonials must be genuine, representative of typical results and backed by evidence.
That matters when you lift a rival's phrasing into your own copy. A quote you did not collect is still your claim once you publish it.
The rules bite hardest on selective quoting. Publishing your three best reviews and ignoring thirty poor ones misleads the reader.
Note the source and date beside every borrowed phrase. If you cannot show where it came from, leave it out.
How should you handle review request emails?
Join a handful of competitor mailing lists with a personal address. Note how soon the first request arrives, how many follow ups land and what incentive, if any, is offered.
A first request that lands within days of delivery usually points to an automated trigger. Note it, then decide whether your own order data could support the same timing.
The ICO's guidance on direct marketing using electronic mail explains the consent and soft opt-in tests that apply to the campaigns you send, including review requests to past buyers.
Copy cadence and timing freely. Do not copy consent wording, because your lawful basis is yours to evidence.
How do you turn findings into a test plan?
Convert each gap into one testable change. If rivals reply to most reviews and you reply to none, test replies for a month. If rival reviews keep mentioning sizing, test a sizing note on the product page.
Write each test against a fixed segment. The commerce reviews buyer personas in England article shows how to hold that segment steady between sprints.
One change per test keeps the result readable. Bundle three changes together and you learn nothing about which one worked.
Log the result in the same table you use for the competitor audit. Over a couple of quarters you get a trail showing which changes moved rating or reply behaviour.
Common questions
How many competitors belong in the set?
For example, five to eight. Fewer than five and you cannot see a pattern; more than eight and the manual work slows to a stop.
How often should the audit repeat?
Quarterly suits most retail calendars, with a light monthly check on new review volume at your two closest rivals.
Can you reuse a competitor's review widget?
Check the vendor's terms before you copy anything. Layout ideas are cheap to borrow, but a rival's customer quotes and images are not yours to publish.



